<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PushBack &#187; Health Care</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pushback.com/topics/healthcare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pushback.com</link>
	<description>Countering Bad Policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 04:41:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>CA’s $3B Stem Cell Law has Little Oversight</title>
		<link>http://pushback.com/2005/02/stem-cell-law-has-little-oversight/</link>
		<comments>http://pushback.com/2005/02/stem-cell-law-has-little-oversight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2005 20:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Sheerin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pushback.com/WordPress/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proposition 71, passed by California voters last year, turns out to use unusual financing that will take money from promised research funds and spend it on interest payments, prevents any changes from being made to the law for 3 years, and the oversight board’s meetings can be immune from California’s open meeting laws. For the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proposition 71, passed by California voters last year, turns out to use unusual financing that will take money from promised research funds and spend it on interest payments, prevents any changes from being made to the law for 3 years, and the oversight board’s meetings can be immune from California’s open meeting laws.</p>
<p>For the whole scoop, read the SF Chronicle’s article from December <a href="http://articles.sfgate.com/2004-12-08/news/17455422_1_cures-initiative-cell-work-california-stem-cell-research">Prop. 71’s fine print contains surprises</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pushback.com/2005/02/stem-cell-law-has-little-oversight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
